I am an Economics PhD candidate at the Center for Doctoral Studies in Economics (CDSE) at University of Mannheim and a researcher at ZEW (Leibniz Center for European Economic Research). My supervisors are Eckhard Janeba and Sebastian Siegloch. I do applied research in the fields of Public Economics, Labor Economics, and the Economics of Science.
Work in Progress
with Johannes Kochems [Discussion Paper]
This paper analyzes the local economic impacts of troop deployments. We exploit variation from the historic large-scale US troop withdrawal from Germany triggered by the end of the Cold War, to estimate the effect on local labor markets and public finances. We use administrative data provided by the US Department of Defense to quantify the size of the troop withdrawal at the municipal level. Using a synthetic difference-in-differences estimator, we find negative effects on local labor markets: for each withdrawn US soldier, the number of local jobs decreases by 0.53. The decrease in economic activity results in a reduction of revenues which municipalities balance by lowering their expenditures, while increasing business and property tax multipliers. In individual-level analyses, we document that workers displaced by the closure of a US military base have persistently lower employment rates. Moreover, their daily wages remain around 9.2 percent lower fifteen years after the layoff. The negative impact on labor outcomes is particularly pronounced for women, older workers, and those employed in regions with more unfavorable initial labor market conditions.
Media Germany: Handelsblatt (1), (2), (3), DIE ZEIT, Süddeutsche Zeitung, DER SPIEGEL, Frankfurter Allgemeine, DIE WELT, Focus, Stern, ntv, Staatsanzeiger BW
Media International: Bloomberg, The Telegraph, IlSole24Ore
Podcast: ZEW Wirklich Wirtschaft: Spotify, Apple Podcasts
Media Germany: Handelsblatt (1), (2), (3), DIE ZEIT, Süddeutsche Zeitung, DER SPIEGEL, Frankfurter Allgemeine, DIE WELT, Focus, Stern, ntv, Staatsanzeiger BW
Media International: Bloomberg, The Telegraph, IlSole24Ore
Podcast: ZEW Wirklich Wirtschaft: Spotify, Apple Podcasts
Repugnant markets, such as organ sales, are often restricted even when they could raise efficiency. We study whether income inequality between transacting parties shapes public repugnance toward such exchanges. We implement vignette experiments in US and European samples. Across both samples, inequality between parties is a powerful predictor of repugnance: transactions are viewed as most objectionable when a low-income individual sells to a medium-income individual and least objectionable when both parties are medium-income. Between the two samples, we find clear differences in baseline attitudes. Europeans show stronger repugnance overall: they are more likely to judge kidney sales and surrogate motherhood as unacceptable, while they do not view prostitution as objectionable to the same degree as Americans, consistent with prevailing social norms. These results provide new evidence on how cultural norms and the direction of inequality shape acceptance of contested markets and can inform debates on the design of market regulation.
with Efi Adamopoulou and Alexandre Gnaedinger
with Abel Brodeur and Michaela Slotwinski
